On this page, I'm going to make some big predictions.
They concern potential future significant archaeological discoveries in Egypt. And other predictions you may find ... tantalizing.
To be clear, the date is currently the 6th of September, 2026 (New Zealand date/time). It is currently 10:04 am as I write this.
Here is my first big prediction.
There are undiscovered passages and chambers inside the Menkaure pyramid in Egypt. The entrance to the currently hidden descending passageway (where you enter and go deeper into the pyramid) should be somewhere close to the flat, smooth granite surface on the East face of the pyramid.
I personally suspect that entrance is somewhere close above the currently visible flat surface of granite you can still see on the East face today, and is probably hidden by the rubble there.
(For context, the open, current tourist entrance is on the North side, in the top/middle-ish of the flat section of granite there. Basically, I'm saying another similar entrance to a separate set of passages and chambers exists probably above the flat section of granite on the East side.)
If you're hoping they discover pristine passages and chambers, unexplored - our very own contemporary Tutankhamun discovery - you'll be sorely disappointed.
My prediction is these passages and chambers were explored in antiquity. There will be permanent damage, without question.
If the original so-called "sarcophagus" is still there in the innermost chamber, it will be made of a hard material - granite or basalt - and will be permanently damaged.
It will be empty.
It may or may not be inscribed with hieroglyphs.
I suspect we'll find traces that originally, a hard material like granite was used for portcullis slabs to block the way forward, probably at multiple points as you progressed deeper.
If any of those slabs still exist, they will likely be in fragments and permanently damaged. They may not be there at all. But the signs they were originally in place will hopefully still be there.
Instead, it is almost certain intruders bored into the softer limestone bedrock and/or masonry that surrounded these slabs.
So the relevant walls and/or masonry will be permanently damaged and altered.
It's certainly possible the passages and chambers will be in rough shape, full of sand and ancient rubbish.
Basically: Don't expect clean, sealed, unopened chambers.
In terms of how many chambers, I don't know.
The basic layout should follow the general layout of other specific Old Kingdom pyramids, like Khufu, Khafre, Menkaure, the Red and Bent pyramids, Unas and Teti, and so on.
So: a long, cramped, sloping passage, maybe a few chambers off to the sides, and eventually, an innermost chamber. That deepest chamber may be lined with granite or limestone. I suspect just limestone at this specific pyramid.
There is almost certainly an innermost chamber. Again, if the original "sarcophagus" is still there, that's where you should find it: damaged, empty.
As for any mummies: No.
Grave goods: Zip. Zilch. Nada.
If there are any genuinely sealed voids later discovered inside Menkaure, that are above/adjacent/connect to these currently hidden spaces, I suspect these will be relieving chamber type voids.
And one thing's for certain: If they're genuinely sealed, and have not been accessed pre-discovery (so, if they're found using muon scans, for example), and the access is controlled, transparent, and trustworthy:
No gang names/Old Kingdom hieratic/ancient Egyptian inscriptions/practical dipinti construction or quarry type marks will be discovered there.
None.
Zip.
Zilch.
Nada.
Nothing.
Again: Nothing. No such marks, no genuine Old Kingdom ancient Egyptian graffiti/construction/gang name type marks, will ever be discovered there of any kind.
I am 100% confident of that, and I am time stamping my prediction today.
In short: What they'll find, if they ever get inside these currently hidden passages and chambers, is a roughly similar layout to certain Old Kingdom pyramids (Khufu/Menkaure/Khafre/Red/Bent/Teti/Unas).
Probably a lot of ancient rubbish and sand.
An empty inner chamber with an empty "sarcophagus."
Damaged limestone walls (due to boring around the granite portcullis slabs).
And if there's any remaining genuinely sealed voids that are ever accessed securely and transparently, they'll find nothing but bare walls.
No inscriptions. No gang names. No cartouches. No nothing.
*
That covers Menkaure.
*
Here is my second big prediction.
I am reasonably confident there are also undiscovered passages and chambers inside/under the Great Pyramid of Giza (Khufu).
Again, think: a sloping, tight passage that may lead to several chambers, ultimately concluding in an innermost chamber. That chamber is likely lined/composed of granite.
But it will still be surrounded by limestone/limestone masonry. The granite will simply line this innermost chamber, similar to the King's Chamber in Khufu.
If these currently hidden passages and chambers exists, the entrance could be on the East, West, or South side. I'm not sure. If I were to speculate, East or West.
Again, if they ever find it (and muon scans deeper in the pyramid may help; for example, in the Subterranean Chamber), again, don't expect another Tutankhamun.
The passages and chambers will be similar to what I've proposed above for Menkaure.
As in:
Explored in antiquity.
The limestone walls and/or masonry damaged in attempts to get around the granite portcullis slabs.
Those slabs probably fragmented and damaged, if they're still there.
The innermost chamber will be empty, no grave goods.
If the original so-called "sarcophagus" is still there, it'll be damaged, empty, and made of some kind of hard material like granite or basalt.
And if any genuinely sealed adjacent spaces exist nearby (for example, sealed relieving spaces), if they are entered in a secure and transparent manner, the walls will be bare.
No gang names.
No dipinti marks.
No cartouches.
No quarry/construction-looking marks.
No nothing.
Just bare, empty walls.
Oh, and there will probably be a lot of ancient rubbish in these spaces: sand, debris, that kind of thing.
*
That ends that prediction.
And on that note, here's my next big prediction.
If the currently sealed Big Void inside the Great Pyramid of Giza (Khufu) is ever securely and transparently entered, they will not find any:
- cartouches
- dipinti marks
- gang names
- any Old Kingdom hieratic
- any ancient Egyptian inscriptions whatsoever
- zero levelling lines, notations, or any red ochre practical construction marks of any kind
In other words: they'll find nothing but bare walls.
And more bare walls.
And oh, look: another bare wall.
And that's it.
*
That concludes my Khufu pyramid predictions.
*
These predictions are based on my personal assessment of these structures.
I have looked at these monuments through a filter no one else today seems to be using.
I've considered what the science says (most of it: plain, ordinary, vanilla science).
I've looked at the evidence from a holistic perspective.
And I am not convinced the contemporary, mainstream explanation for what these structures are, who built them, and why, hold water.
In fact, the science is pointing in a very different, unusual direction.
Hence the umbrella name of my overarching investigation: The Science of the Stones™.
I am confident I now know exactly what the original builders were trying to accomplish.
And in that regard, I am confident they were very successful. Basically: they achieved their goal.
Therefore, I know approximately what to expect when/if these new discoveries are made.
In time, I hope to reveal my insights, including all the science, and the holistic evidence, and what the cumulative picture clearly appears to reveal.
Many will be surprised.
My perspective will almost certainly be controversial, but probably accepted by many.
In fact, for a lot of people, once you see these structures the way I do, you'll probably have an "a ha" moment: Oh, now I get it. Wow. Didn't see that coming.
*
Here are several softer predictions.
These are much less certain, because they depend on public reactions to the facts and claims I'm going to present in the months and years ahead, how certain institutions respond, and how the case unfolds in the court of public opinion.
Even so, given enough time, once all the facts come to light, I suspect some major scandals are going to unfold.
Initially, I suspect major stakeholder institutions may respond defensively, and try to silo and compartmentalize the individual facts I bring to light, and simply explain them away.
But the facts will speak for themselves, and I'm confident a sensible, informed public will quickly realize the cumulative weight of the facts, and what they point to.
In other words, over time, certain contemporary institutional narratives are going to come under intense pressure. Whether that pressure leads to change, or perennial posturing and defensiveness by relevant stakeholders, remains to be seen.
Without further ado, here we go:
Once I bring all the facts to light, the idea that Howard Vyse and John Shae Perring deserve full, unquestionable credit for discovering the previously sealed Khufu relieving chambers will probably come under intense pressure.
I have evidence that suggests a major scandal is about to unfold in that regard.
The idea that Howard Vyse and John Shae Perring "discovered" genuine Old Kingdom hieratic inscriptions (gang names, cartouches, practical construction marks, and so on) in several contexts (especially the Khufu relieving chambers) may also come under intense pressure.
The idea that these marks are genuine at all now appears highly questionable. I suspect once the public understands the information I'm currently sitting on, enormous doubt may quickly build in that regard.
Subsequently, other apparent similar "discoveries" may come under increasing pressure. (For example, similar marks "discovered" by George Andrew Reisner and Alessandro Barsanti.)
In time, especially if the Khufu relieving chamber marks are ever scientifically tested and proven to be blatant forgeries, it is possible these "discoveries" will, in essence, be wiped from the archaeological record.
They are, quite simply, institutionally embarrassing.
And I hope - for the sake of those institutions - that all the facts I bring to light are fairly evaluated, and not hand waved or poorly explained away.
To be clear: I am not suggesting or proposing that mainstream archaeology/Egyptology is the problem here.
These experts are trained within a certain framework, and do not consider these marks suspicious. And why should they? No one has ever produced a convincing argument as to why they are.
But that is all about to change.
And over time, it should become obvious that these marks are highly suspicious.
Put simply: Certain individuals hoodwinked us all. They were clever (particularly Howard Vyse), but not clever enough, as you'll eventually find out.
What would be tragic is if, when it becomes obvious and apparent how certain individuals deceived the public, certain institutions respond by continuing to defend them, despite the compelling and mounting problems.
I hope that will not be the case, and that the facts will be given a fair shake.
Eventually, I suspect the court of public opinion may force the issue. The facts are simply too strong.
But we'll see.
Time will tell.
*
Best,
Marcus Maclean
11:00 am
06/09/2026
Auckland, New Zealand
