Showing posts with label Egypt predictions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Egypt predictions. Show all posts

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Two other predictions for potential future rediscoveries in Egypt

I want to add two other predictions of rediscoveries that I suspect, in time, could be made in Egypt. And these won't be minor: they'll be major, significant, and important.

And first, a refinement of my previous post.

I should have been more specific with my wording with regards to both the Khufu and Menkaure "discoveries".

To be clear, I'm predicting "rediscoveries," as I am 100% confident the now hidden passages and chambers in/under the Khufu and Menkaure pyramids were thoroughly explored in antiquity.

And on that note, today, I'm predicting two more rediscoveries: one at the Khafre pyramid in Giza - and another at the Red pyramid in Dahshūr.

My first prediction: what could be rediscovered at the Khafre pyramid in Giza

As with my earlier prediction for both the Khufu and Menkaure pyramids, I suspect there are currently hidden passages and chambers under/in the Khafre pyramid in Giza.

However, the entrance to these now closed spaces almost certainly won't be on the North side.

Instead, that entrance (or entrances) could be on the East, West, or South side - I'm unsure. I'm just confident it won't be on the North side.

And, as with Khufu/Menkaure, don't hold your breath. You're not going to find pristine, untouched spaces.

These spaces should have been thoroughly explored during antiquity. The limestone walls/masonry/bedrock - at least at the choke points, likely originally blocked by a harder stone like granite - are almost certainly permanently damaged.

Quite simply, the first "intruders" bored their way through the softer limestone, to get around the harder granite. I am confident of that.

I am 100% confident the "sarcophagus" - if it's still there, in the innermost chamber - is empty and permanently damaged.

There may still be traces of the harder stone (possibly granite) used to block the way forward at key choke points. A portcullis zone or two, with hopefully visible traces of how the blocks were supported that once stood in the way.

Some of the blocks or fragments of them may still be there. It's hard to say.

The passages and chambers are likely full of sand, ancient debris and rubbish, and will probably be unpleasant to explore. It should take a considerable amount of time to clear them and make them "tourist worthy".

That's it for Khafre.

My second prediction: what could be rediscovered at the Red pyramid in Dahshūr

My prediction for the Red pyramid, in line with Khafre/Khufu/Menkaure, is essentially the same.

Currently hidden spaces (a descending passageway, a few chambers, an innermost chamber with an empty/damaged "sarcophagus," if it's still there, and access passageways originally blocked at key choke points by some sort of hard stone like granite).

The original entrance(s) won't be on the North side. Again, they'll likely be on either the East, West, or South side; I'm unsure.

Again, the limestone walls/masonry/bedrock around the original chokepoints (at one time probably blocked by granite portcullis slabs) should now be permanently damaged.

Why? The original "intruders" almost certainly bored their way around the harder stone.

Hopefully, some of those granite portcullis slabs still remain, or at least fragments of them; I'm not sure. We'll see.

And that's it. Basically: same same.

Why am I so confident? How am I able to make these predictions?

Simple. I don't see certain Old Kingdom pyramids (Red/Bent/Teti/Unas/Khufu/Khafre/Menkaure/probably others, especially at Abusir) the same way you do.

I've looked at them from a different perspective.

I've considered how they originally looked and what their early, post-construction states likely were.

I've also taken into account what certain, specific science has to say about what these pyramids would have done in those early states.

Most of this is plain vanilla science. Nothing controversial.

It's what the science points to that is controversial.

Luckily, even that is now mainstream science.

So no credentialed expert who genuinely understands the science is going to argue with me. They'll get it. Yes, under these conditions, those pyramids would almost certainly have done X.

The big question is why. If this was the original intention, why did the original builders construct these spaces to do that.

And I'm not talking about anything silly like a power plant, so relax.

The mechanism is fairly simple, straight forward, and easy to understand.

And, interestingly, at least one aspect of what appears to be the original intention still works quite well today.

Amazingly well in fact.

And the key thing I've realized - because I now understand what these pyramids appear to have been built to do and why - is that space utilization is everything.

In short: they're practical structures. They had a specific, practical purpose. And the builders almost certainly would have wanted to utilize as much of the space as they could.

Sorry, I know that's a little mysterious. And for now, it'll have to do.

Again, in time I plan to release more.

It will take time.

So please be patient and bear with me.

Best,

Marcus Maclean

6:17 pm, 14/09/2026

Auckland, New Zealand